RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — Some of North Carolina government’s restrictions on dispensing abortion pills — such as requiring that only doctors provide the drug — are unlawful because they frustrate the goal of Congress to use regulators to ensure the drug is distributed safely, a federal judge ruled on Tuesday.
U.S. District Judge Catherine Eagles in Greensboro granted a partial victory to a physician who performs abortions and last year sued state and local prosecutors and state health and medical officials.
Other restrictions on the drug mifepristone that were challenged, however, such as requiring an in-person consultation 72 hours in advance and an in-person examination before a prescription, are not preempted, Eagles wrote. That is because they have not been expressly reviewed and rejected by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or because they focus more on the practice of medicine and potential pregnancy-related health issues, she added.
Related articles:
Related suggestion:
Shandong charms U.S. visitors with cultural delightsU.S. urged to stop sending wrong signals to 'Taiwan independence' separatist forcesXi Story: China's Youth Stand at Forefront of InnovationXi Focus: Xi Urges Inner Mongolia to Pursue Green Development, Advance Chinese ModernizationWorld Insights: How China Strives to Improve Global Human Rights Governance for a Better WorldXiconomics: China's Green Development Philosophy Is Contributing to Global Sustainable GrowthCitizens in Yinchang enjoyed outdoor skiing during the Spring Festival holidayXi Stresses Cultural Advancement in Letter to ForumGoing against laws of free trade market is like building a dam of sieves: Chinese FM spokespersonChinese President Appoints New Ambassadors
2.4605s , 6503.0078125 kb
Copyright © 2024 Powered by Some North Carolina abortion pill restrictions are unlawful, federal judge says ,International Insight news portal